Waste (except solid and hazardous) collection services · California

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation

Costa Mesa, CA · ~61 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste (except solid and hazardous) collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation: 6.9 TCR = 265% of Waste (except solid and hazardous) collection services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation safety composite

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2020

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation injury rate improved

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation's TCR fell 1.1 from 9.3 in 2017 to 8.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562119 · Costa Mesa, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 265% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #7/14
  • PHOTO Ceres Environmental …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ceres Environmental Services - Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation averages 6.9 TCR (265% of the Waste (except solid and hazardous) collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation TCR series: 2017=9.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=8.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation falls in its industry

57 Waste (except solid and hazard establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Waste (except solid and hazard employers in California.

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation (61 employees, TCR 6.9) among 24 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 25 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation
Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation (61 employees, TCR 6.9) among 24 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation has more employees than the Waste (except solid and hazardous) colle median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.1 4.9 5 0 0
2019 6.6 5.5 6 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2017 9.3 9.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562119 · CA · Costa Mesa

57 Waste (except solid and hazardous) collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 185 employers in Costa Mesa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ceres Environmental Services - Florida 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Trans 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Waste Solutions - Cresson/Glen Rose 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atomic Recycling, LLC 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silveira Farms 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Brucherie Produce, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olds Ranch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1750 Production Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACIFIC AMPHITHEATER 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR OC Fair & Event Center 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Costa Mesa 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACWEST Security Services 567 FTE
NAT-TCR UNI 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0000000074 Quickchek Food Stores 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Montrose MR 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Baptist Memorials Services Elsie Gayer Facility 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaCrosse - Commerce Street 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foremost Farms - Lancaster 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duffy School 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 32 Vogtle Office 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.