Industry profile · NAICS 562119

Waste (except solid and hazardous) hauling, local

Workplace injury rates across 59 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

59
Employers
5.8
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
557
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Waste (except solid and hazardous) hauling, local average 5.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

5.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
59
employers reporting
557
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Waste (except solid and hazardous) hauling, local Safety Data Reveals

The Waste (except solid and hazardous) hauling, local sector (NAICS 562119) encompasses 59 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 557 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.8 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Waste (except solid and hazardous) hauling, local that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
1-800-Got-Junk? West Hills, CA F 27.3
CA-IMS Electronics Recycling, Inc Poway, CA F 16.4
Capital Waste Services Columbia, SC F 15.6
Pecan Rancho Cucamonga, CA F 14.0
Recology Blossom Valley Organics North Vernalis, CA F 11.6
Best Way Disposal Anderson Andrson, IN F 11.5
Ceres Environmental Services - Florida DMS Marianna, FL F 11.5
Hilton Trucking & Supply Co. Central Point, OR F 9.8
S.E.G. Trucking Pittsburg Pittsburg, CA F 9.1
Mercado's Dumpster Service Charlotte, NC F 8.9
S.E.G. Trucking Concord Concord, CA F 7.9
Frontier Waste Solutions - Justin Justin, TX F 7.9
PRR Paramount, CA F 7.5
RGL Vegas LLC North Las Vegas, NV F 7.3
Atlanta Trans Smyrna, GA F 7.1
Atomic Recycling, LLC Minneapolis, MN F 7.1
Phoenix Trans Phoenix, AZ F 7.1
Adopt A Highway Maintenance Corporation Costa Mesa, CA F 6.9
Ceres Environmental Services - Florida Sarasota, FL F 6.9
Frontier Waste Solutions - Cresson/Glen Rose Cresson, TX F 6.7
Recology Ostrom Road Wheatland, CA F 6.4
Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery Park Pittsburg, CA F 6.3
Adam's Sanitation Milton, FL F 5.6
Droptine Utility Construction New Braunfels, TX F 5.6
San Diego Trans Lakeside, CA F 5.5
Eastern Waste Systems, Inc. Pompano Beach, FL F 5.2
Recology Blossom Valley Organics South Lamont, CA D 5.0
Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery - Accounting Concord, CA D 5.0
Bulldog Disposal & Recycling, Inc. Kingman, AZ D 4.6
Russo and Sons, LLC Ocoee, FL D 4.5
Site Waste Service, LLC Columbus, OH D 4.4
Tampa Trans Tampa, FL D 4.3
United Interior Service, Inc Greenvale, NY D 4.1
Southern Construction Athens, TN D 3.8
Frontier Waste Solutions - Texoma Pottsboro, TX D 3.7
Dallas Trans Dallas, TX D 3.7
Logistics Recycling Inc. - Green Bay Green Bay, WI D 3.4
Frontier Waste Solutions - Dayton Dayton, TX D 3.3
Austin Trans Austin, TX D 3.2
Chicago Trans Chicago, IL C 3.1
Frontier Waste Solutions - Corpus Christi/Dayton Corpus Christi, TX C 3.1
Bytec Resource Management, Inc Monroe, WI C 2.7
Liquid Environmental Solutions of Texas, LLC Irving, TX C 2.7
Six Mile, LLC Anchorage, AK C 2.5
SoCal Trans Riverside, CA C 2.5
LZ Logistics, LLC Mountain Grove, MO C 2.4
Ceres Environmental Services - Georgia Albany, GA C 2.4
FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Houston Biosolids) Houston, TX C 2.4
McCutcheon Enterprises, Inc Apollo, PA C 2.2
Nation Waste, Inc. Houston, TX C 2.1
Page 1 of 2 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Waste (except solid and hazardous) hauling, local?

This sector averages 5.8 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.