Group homes for the disabled without nursing care · Michigan

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan

Ann Arbor, MI · ~202 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Group homes for the disabled without nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan: 1.1 TCR = 29% of Group homes for the disabled without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan safety composite

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan held a steady TCR band

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Ann Arbor, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #2/44
  • PHOTO Mission Mental Health
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~202 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mission Mental Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan averages 1.1 TCR (29% of the Group homes for the disabled without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan falls in its industry

560 Group homes for the disabled w establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 44 Group homes for the disabled w employers in Michigan.

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan (202 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan
Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan (202 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan has more employees than the Group homes for the disabled without nur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.2 0.1 3 17 0
2021 0.3 0.3 6 28 2
2020 0.0 0.0 5 0 0
2019 6.1 2.7 9 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · MI · Ann Arbor

560 Group homes for the disabled without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mission Mental Health 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpine House of Ravenna 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEW ALTERNATIVES, INC - SAN PASQUAL CLINIC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR New York City 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nisou Enterprises 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Bay Packaging Inc. Kalamazoo Division 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walsworth 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE ADAC Automotive, Inc. - Port City Plant 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR 9123-Sea-Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-03577 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lundgren Management 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hicks Lightning Protection 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lorenz Bus 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03345 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-ALBIR5 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE 361407-Clt-Ballantyne Sta 202 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.