Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Ohio

Alpine House of Ravenna

Bryan, OH · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpine House of Ravenna runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade A.

Alpine House of Ravenna: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpine House of Ravenna safety composite

Alpine House of Ravenna scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Alpine House of Ravenna held a steady TCR band

Alpine House of Ravenna's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Bryan, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO NEW ALTERNATIVES, IN…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEW ALTERNATIVES, INC - SAN PASQUAL CLINIC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Alpine House of Ravenna in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpine House of Ravenna averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpine House of Ravenna TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Alpine House of Ravenna falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Ohio.

Alpine House of Ravenna (27 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpine House of Ravenna
Alpine House of Ravenna (27 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Alpine House of Ravenna has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · OH · Bryan

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 56 employers in Bryan, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEW ALTERNATIVES, INC - SAN PASQUAL CLINIC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Mental Health 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-581335 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Creque Farms Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Pond Gardens Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wen Mar Farms, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 2 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spangler Candy Co. 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spangler Candy Co. (INC.) 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2191 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allied Moulded Products, Inc. 315 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Rebar King George 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR R J Tricon Co 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott's Diversified Construction, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro Vision Transport 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silverton 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Glendale 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Jacksonville East 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Facility 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.