Group foster homes for children · California

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic

Escondido, CA · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Group foster homes for children workplace, earning a grade A.

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Group foster homes for children BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic safety composite

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic held a steady TCR band

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Escondido, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/91
  • PHOTO Alpine House of Rave…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpine House of Ravenna (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Group foster homes for children BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic falls in its industry

560 Group foster homes for childre establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 91 Group foster homes for childre employers in California.

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic (35 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic
New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic (35 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

New Alternatives, Inc - San Pasqual Clinic has fewer employees than the Group foster homes for children median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Escondido

560 Group foster homes for children employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Escondido, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpine House of Ravenna 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Mental Health 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-581335 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adult Learning Systems Lower Michigan 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Escondido 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Escondido 3,031 FTE
CITY-NEAR Escondido CA 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Portage Electric Products, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HAECO Cabin Solutions - WBG 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SJC Patient Accounts 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Anning-Johnson Company Nevada 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elevation Excavation Office 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill-Winchester 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earle M Jorgensen Co 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fsc2 - Forensic Science Center 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.