Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.

Export, PA · ~59 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2021

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Export, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO John Deere Intellige…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

236 Printed circuit assemblies man establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Printed circuit assemblies man employers in Pennsylvania.

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · PA · Export

236 Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 34 employers in Export, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polyfusion Electronics Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Inc. (Coralville) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rantec Power Systems Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone Generating Station 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&A Homes, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prism Response, LLC 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dormont Manufacturing Company 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #0032 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Location 158 FTE
NAT-TCR SNC Solutions 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Building Products - Marion 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S09805 - Phoenix Call Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CCNA - Waco Thermal Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bsvg, LLC Austin 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buerkle Acura 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masco Coatings Group St. Louis Operations 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pipestone Truss 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.