Loaded computer boards manufacturing · North Dakota

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group

Fargo, ND · ~922 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Loaded computer boards manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Loaded computer boards manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group safety composite

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2021→2023

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group injury rate improved

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.0 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Fargo, ND AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK P71
  • PHOTO Advanced Manufacturi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~922 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Loaded computer boards manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group falls in its industry

236 Loaded computer boards manufac establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group (922 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group
John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group (922 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

John Deere Intelligent Solutions Group has more employees than the Loaded computer boards manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.4 5 0 0
2022 0.9 0.5 9 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · ND · Fargo

236 Loaded computer boards manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polyfusion Electronics Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Inc. (Coralville) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rantec Power Systems Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LM Wind Power 907 FTE
STATE-SIZE ND,BISMARCK - Medical Center Campus - Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) 867 FTE
STATE-SIZE Discovery Benefits 845 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Deere Electronic Solutions 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Martin Machine and Welding Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BHF - Baystate Health Foundation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 131 - Gm-Mason Dc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Canton 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - McKinney 922 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMS Group Inc 922 FTE
NAT-SIZE FL180 Palatka Paper 922 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.