Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Aegis Gardens of Fremont

Fremont, CA · ~80 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis Gardens of Fremont runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis Gardens of Fremont: 11.1 TCR = 292% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis Gardens of Fremont safety composite

Aegis Gardens of Fremont scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis Gardens of Fremont: 6.1 → 23.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 43.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.79× in 2024

Aegis Gardens of Fremont's TCR rose 17.1 from 6.1 in 2016 to 23.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fremont, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 292% of ind

  • DART 19.9 DART
  • RANK #402/635
  • PHOTO Las Villas Del Norte
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Las Villas Del Norte (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Aegis Gardens of Fremont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis Gardens of Fremont averages 11.1 TCR (292% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis Gardens of Fremont TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=43.6 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=23.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis Gardens of Fremont falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #402 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Aegis Gardens of Fremont (80 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis Gardens of Fremont
Aegis Gardens of Fremont (80 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis Gardens of Fremont has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.2 19.9 4 10 0
2023 11.9 11.9 1 6 0
2022 43.6 42.1 5 24 0
2021 8.6 6.8 3 2 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.1 6.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fremont

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Las Villas Del Norte 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MONROE-SLMS-SG WEST MONROE 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Montera 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Beacon at Gulf Breeze 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR 1131 Lkq 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Factory location 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Brothers, Inc. - Main 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Village at Utz Terrace 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE AW of Murfreesboro 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avoca, LLC - NC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardner Manufacturing Company 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE IG Design Group Americas, Inc. - Hagerstown, MD 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.