Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Aegis of Corte Madera

Corte Madera, CA · ~103 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Corte Madera runs at 372% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Corte Madera: 14.1 TCR = 372% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Corte Madera safety composite

Aegis of Corte Madera scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Corte Madera: 13.1 → 19.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 62.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2024

Aegis of Corte Madera's TCR rose 6.1 from 13.1 in 2016 to 19.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 62.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Corte Madera, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 372% of ind

  • DART 13.2 DART
  • RANK #489/635
  • PHOTO Brookdale Niagara As…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Niagara Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Corte Madera in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Corte Madera averages 14.1 TCR (372% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Corte Madera TCR series: 2016=13.1 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=32.3 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=62.7 · 2023=26.8 · 2024=19.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Corte Madera falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #489 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Aegis of Corte Madera (103 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Corte Madera
Aegis of Corte Madera (103 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Corte Madera has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.2 13.2 15 4 0
2023 26.8 26.8 14 12 0
2022 62.7 62.7 7 49 0
2021 5.8 5.8 3 2 0
2020 32.3 30.3 5 27 0
2019 8.9 6.7 8 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2017 4.5 3.4 4 0 0
2016 13.1 11.8 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Corte Madera

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 33 employers in Corte Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Niagara Assisted Living 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Remington Park 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paramount Court Senior Living 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GV-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR GREENVILLE 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE T&A Onions - Huron - Harvest 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Macdoel Fields 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexandra Dates Inc 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE DiMare Company 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR HQ RH 578 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6439-270 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corte Madera Village 328 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9277-3420850 94 FTE
NAT-TCR store 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Highway Department 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metier Construction, Inc. 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01970 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Clive Police Department 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Clive Fire Department 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pukall Lumber Company Inc 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bei - Ma 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.