Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Eagle Lake Village

Susanville, CA · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagle Lake Village runs at 420% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Eagle Lake Village: 16.0 TCR = 420% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagle Lake Village safety composite

Eagle Lake Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−39.2

2016→2023

Eagle Lake Village injury rate improved

Eagle Lake Village's TCR fell 39.2 from 42.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 54.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=42.4 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=19.7 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=54.5 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Susanville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 420% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #519/635
  • PHOTO Aegis of Fremont
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Fremont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Eagle Lake Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagle Lake Village averages 16.0 TCR (420% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagle Lake Village TCR series: 2016=42.4 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=19.7 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=54.5 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Eagle Lake Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #519 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Eagle Lake Village (42 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagle Lake Village
Eagle Lake Village (42 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Eagle Lake Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2021 54.5 39.4 9 9 0
2020 11.2 2.8 4 0 0
2019 19.7 14.8 7 1 0
2018 14.5 7.3 4 0 0
2016 42.4 18.2 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Susanville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 32 employers in Susanville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Fremont 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY EVANS PARK OPERATION LLC 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tequesta Memory Care 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunny West Investments, Ltd. 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Desert State Prison - 934 1,251 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Correctional Center 1,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTHERN REGION : LMU 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Susanville 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Buffalo Plains Genetics, LLC. 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoy's Reload Center 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR APX Industrial Coatings 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dexter 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CCI 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE HomeSmart CO - Quentin St-021 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jones Station-126 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lighting Resources USA Inc 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.