Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Aegis of Napa

Napa, CA · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Napa runs at 363% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Napa: 13.8 TCR = 363% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Napa safety composite

Aegis of Napa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Napa: 2.3 → 22.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 58.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Aegis of Napa's TCR rose 20.0 from 2.3 in 2016 to 22.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 58.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Napa, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 363% of ind

  • DART 20.3 DART
  • RANK #483/635
  • PHOTO San Dimas Retirement…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Dimas Retirement Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Napa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Napa averages 13.8 TCR (363% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Napa TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=27.3 · 2021=24.3 · 2022=53.1 · 2023=58 · 2024=22.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Napa falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #483 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Aegis of Napa (59 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Napa
Aegis of Napa (59 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Napa has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.3 20.3 2 9 0
2023 58.0 53.7 5 22 0
2022 53.1 53.1 2 21 0
2021 24.3 24.3 4 7 0
2020 27.3 27.3 5 10 0
2019 11.9 9.9 6 0 0
2018 6.4 2.1 3 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Napa

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 186 employers in Napa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Dimas Retirement Center 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Cookeville 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood at Ashburn AL 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 532 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of State Hospitals-Napa 2,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Napa County 1,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001420 1,142 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0509 West Newton 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FLJ007 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR St Joseph Rehab and Nursing Center 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida Dredge & Dock, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Esper Electric, Ltd. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grinnell 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Detroit 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.