Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines · Texas

AER Manufacturing, L. P.

Carrollton, TX · ~513 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AER Manufacturing, L. P. runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines workplace, earning a grade F.

AER Manufacturing, L. P.: 11.4 TCR = 211% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AER Manufacturing, L. P. safety composite

AER Manufacturing, L. P. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AER Manufacturing, L. P.: 10.3 → 11.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2018

AER Manufacturing, L. P.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 10.3 in 2016 to 11.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Carrollton, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 211% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO L.E. Jones Company
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 181 inj
  • SIZE ~513 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L.E. Jones Company (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

AER Manufacturing, L. P. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AER Manufacturing, L. P. averages 11.4 TCR (211% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AER Manufacturing, L. P. TCR series: 2016=10.3 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=11.6 · BLS 5.4

Where AER Manufacturing, L. P. falls in its industry

221 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Texas.

AER Manufacturing, L. P. (513 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AER Manufacturing, L. P.
AER Manufacturing, L. P. (513 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

AER Manufacturing, L. P. has more employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 11.6 10.1 59 2 0
2017 12.3 11.4 65 0 0
2016 10.3 8.0 57 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · TX · Carrollton

221 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 331 employers in Carrollton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L.E. Jones Company 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yen Group, LLC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryant Racing Inc 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matix Corporation of America - Pioneer 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Joy Global Surface Mining Inc. - Longview, TX 513 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Jewelry Channel 513 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitney Bowes Presort Services - Dallas Fort Worth (TX44) 513 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windfern 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-35281 2,390 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Brandt Companies, LLC 2,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elite Line Services - Amazon Account 1,669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Carrollton 1,520 FTE
NAT-TCR MidCon Products Hortonville 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulldawg Holdings 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR JP Masonry Inc 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LakeMed Care and Rehabilitation 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE La Palma Correctional Center 513 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millercoors Trenton Brewery 513 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Milton's - 0705 513 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunt Valley Corporate Headquarters 513 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.