Windmills, electric power, generation-type, manufacturing · California

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs

North Palm Springs, CA · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Windmills, electric power, generation-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Windmills, electric power, generation-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs safety composite

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs: 4.7 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.82× in 2022

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs's TCR rose 2.5 from 4.7 in 2018 to 7.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333611 · North Palm Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #11/13
  • PHOTO Solar Turbines Incor…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Solar Turbines Incorporated DSLF Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Wind Generation Palm Springs averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Windmills, electric power, generation-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=0 · 2022=7.2 · BLS 3.3

Where AES Wind Generation Palm Springs falls in its industry

97 Windmills, electric power, gen establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Windmills, electric power, gen employers in California.

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs (22 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Wind Generation Palm Springs
AES Wind Generation Palm Springs (22 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 2.0

AES Wind Generation Palm Springs has fewer employees than the Windmills, electric power, generation-ty median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.2 7.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333611 · CA · North Palm Springs

97 Windmills, electric power, generation-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 5 employers in North Palm Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Solar Turbines Incorporated DSLF Office 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blade Dynamics, US 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GE Gas Power - Bangor 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovative Machining Technology, Inc. Boyertown, PA 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 922 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR AES Clean Energy Palm Springs 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1262 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Gorgonio, West Winds II, LLC 18 FTE
NAT-TCR Global Tissue Group 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SDF3 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-11DA513 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashland Retail Plant 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Munters Corporation, Natural Bridge, VA 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Grain Elevator 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Trucking Terminal 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE U709-90 Geiger Road 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.