Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Massachusetts

AIMS Logistics LLC

Holyoke, MA · ~96 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AIMS Logistics LLC runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

AIMS Logistics LLC: 5.5 TCR = 84% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AIMS Logistics LLC safety composite

AIMS Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2023→2024

AIMS Logistics LLC injury rate improved

AIMS Logistics LLC's TCR fell 4.3 from 7.6 in 2023 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.6 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Holyoke, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.5 · 84% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #37/164
  • PHOTO Principal Delivery, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Principal Delivery, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

AIMS Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AIMS Logistics LLC averages 5.5 TCR (84% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AIMS Logistics LLC TCR series: 2023=7.6 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 6.5

Where AIMS Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 164 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Massachusetts.

AIMS Logistics LLC (96 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate AIMS Logistics LLC
AIMS Logistics LLC (96 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

AIMS Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2023 7.6 7.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MA · Holyoke

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 92 employers in Holyoke, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Principal Delivery, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DXY4 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 3301 BRUENING CIRCLE 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHATTANOOGA (TNCHA) 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 961-NiSource-Lawrence MA 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Public Works 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tocco Corporation 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Channel Fish Co. Inc 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holyoke Medical Center 1,405 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISO New England Inc. 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DBO7 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Providence Behavioral Hlth Hosp 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Concepts in Millwork, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Terre Haute 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas, TX H&C 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alan Vander Horst 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Siteworks LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elderhaus PACE 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Zaza Memorial City 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rich Ice Cream Company 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.