Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing · Minnesota

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems

Chanhassen, MN · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems safety composite

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Chanhassen, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO SPT MICROTECHNOLOGIES
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPT MICROTECHNOLOGIES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems falls in its industry

133 Semiconductor making machinery establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Semiconductor making machinery employers in Minnesota.

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems (94 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems
Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems (94 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems has fewer employees than the Semiconductor making machinery manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · MN · Chanhassen

133 Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 65 employers in Chanhassen, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPT MICROTECHNOLOGIES 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR USFSO 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTKA01 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin TEA 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wind Energy Group 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Puris Dawson 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARYZTA - Chaska 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beacon Promotions Inc 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWCO Chanhassen 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHANHASSEN 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Chanhassen 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR TBG2 350 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at West Virginia Univ Concession 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Steadfast Investment Properties, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corpus Christi,TX 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemini Bakery Equipment Company 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westside Anaheim 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE McQ6 Logistix, LLC 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crossroads Care Center of Milwaukee 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.