Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing · Minnesota

Air Quality Engineering, Inc.

Minneapolis, MN · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Air Quality Engineering, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 167% of Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Air Quality Engineering, Inc.: 2.8 → 9.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Air Quality Engineering, Inc.'s TCR rose 6.9 from 2.8 in 2020 to 9.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 167% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Solberg Manufacturin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Solberg Manufacturing Hilltop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Air Quality Engineering, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (167% of the Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2020=2.8 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=9.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Air Quality Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

232 Air purification equipment, st establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Air purification equipment, st employers in Minnesota.

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Air Quality Engineering, Inc.
Air Quality Engineering, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Air Quality Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Air purification equipment, stationary, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.8 4.9 4 0 0
2023 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 9.3 9.3 3 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · MN · Minneapolis

232 Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Solberg Manufacturing Hilltop 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkton 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dampers, Louvers CA 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Horton- Oconee County 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Farming 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feedmill TW Shop - SE 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Brigade Energy Services 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wild Rice Electric Cooperative, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Valley Electric Association, Fairbanks 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2442 - Olive Branch West 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2139 - Westheimer 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1856 - Poughkeepsie 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Runnings of Sioux Falls 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Star Metals Mfg Co 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Copco North American Distribution Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amundson Roofing, Inc 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.