Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

AirBorn Lake City

Lake City, PA · ~283 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AirBorn Lake City runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

AirBorn Lake City: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AirBorn Lake City safety composite

AirBorn Lake City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2018→2024

AirBorn Lake City injury rate improved

AirBorn Lake City's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.5 in 2018 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Lake City, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Amphenol Borisch Tec…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~283 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amphenol Borisch Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

AirBorn Lake City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AirBorn Lake City averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AirBorn Lake City TCR series: 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where AirBorn Lake City falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Pennsylvania.

AirBorn Lake City (283 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate AirBorn Lake City
AirBorn Lake City (283 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

AirBorn Lake City has more employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2022 1.6 0.7 4 1 0
2021 4.1 3.7 7 3 0
2020 1.1 0.7 3 0 0
2019 2.5 2.0 4 1 0
2018 3.5 0.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · PA · Lake City

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 16 employers in Lake City, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Borisch Technologies 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JST Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex Pinellas Park 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-OH06 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Glass Works 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews International Corporation - Pittsburgh Bronze 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews International Corporation 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4348 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Donuts 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Donuts Erie, LLC 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Technologies 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR AirBorn 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Bulleit Distilling Co. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Branch 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4034 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR General Excavation, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springfield ReManufacturing Corporation 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Renaissance 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE KYTC District 10 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-MAG 283 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.