Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

Airmark Components, Inc.

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Airmark Components, Inc. runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Airmark Components, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 30% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Airmark Components, Inc. safety composite

Airmark Components, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Airmark Components, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.98× in 2024

Airmark Components, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Fort Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 30% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #36/137
  • PHOTO NTA Operations PAX
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NTA Operations PAX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Airmark Components, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Airmark Components, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (30% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Airmark Components, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Airmark Components, Inc. falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 137 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Florida.

Airmark Components, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Airmark Components, Inc.
Airmark Components, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Airmark Components, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NTA Operations PAX 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oscoda Engine Services Corp 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support INT MRO 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-A573 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yee Farms Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OZBLU USA LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK-Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant City Office 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR 9 - Rochester 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kele, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nucor Steel Auburn, Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Albemarle High School 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Helfers Electric Company, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 06018-06-06-SALINAS 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3 - Duluth 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Moving & storage, Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.