Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Michigan

Oscoda Engine Services Corp

Oscoda, MI · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oscoda Engine Services Corp runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Oscoda Engine Services Corp: 1.3 TCR = 30% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oscoda Engine Services Corp safety composite

Oscoda Engine Services Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Oscoda Engine Services Corp held a steady TCR band

Oscoda Engine Services Corp's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Oscoda, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/20
  • PHOTO NTA Operations PAX
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NTA Operations PAX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Oscoda Engine Services Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oscoda Engine Services Corp averages 1.3 TCR (30% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oscoda Engine Services Corp TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Oscoda Engine Services Corp falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 20 Maintenance and repair service employers in Michigan.

Oscoda Engine Services Corp (25 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Oscoda Engine Services Corp
Oscoda Engine Services Corp (25 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Oscoda Engine Services Corp has fewer employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MI · Oscoda

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 12 employers in Oscoda, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NTA Operations PAX 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airmark Components, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support INT MRO 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-A573 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazel Park 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayside Best Beans LLC. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Blanchard 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 KALITTA AIR LLC-1573MI1 1,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9379-10 963 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Standard-Oscoda Plant 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Composite Solutions, LLC 106 FTE
NAT-TCR Flint Hills Resources Peru 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Abilene Motor Express LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR West Lebanon NH Store 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse) - DBA Billone Mechanical Contractors 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Centrica Business Solutions - Vista Solar 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Packaging Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contech MSYMP 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : LFT - Lafayette 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.