Monosodium glutamate manufacturing · Iowa

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc.

Eddyville, IA · ~133 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Monosodium glutamate manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Monosodium glutamate manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. safety composite

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.6 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Eddyville, IA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #14/17
  • PHOTO REG Danville LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: REG Danville LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Monosodium glutamate manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. falls in its industry

552 Monosodium glutamate manufactu establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 17 Monosodium glutamate manufactu employers in Iowa.

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. (133 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc.
Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. (133 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. has more employees than the Monosodium glutamate manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2019 3.1 2.3 4 0 0
2018 1.6 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · IA · Eddyville

552 Monosodium glutamate manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 14 employers in Eddyville, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR REG Danville LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Biochemical Corp 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niacet 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evonik Corporation 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schaal Plumbing, Heating, and Cooling 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moveero Armstrong Iowa 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meridian manufacturing 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coilcraft - Hawarden 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cargill Eddyville 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cargill Eddyville Iowa 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc. 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100110000205-CRG-CARGILL/EDDYVILLE/IA 139 FTE
NAT-TCR 06018-06-06-SALINAS 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Astec Rossville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S-5! Manufacturing a Division of Metal Roof Innovations Ltd 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 210 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lifetime Benefit Solutions - Butternut Dr 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : GUM - Guam 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain View Center 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.