Support Activities for Air Transportation · Hawaii

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue

Lihue, HI · ~133 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue: 2.3 TCR = 52% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Lihue, HI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #13/36
  • PHOTO Prospect Airport Ser…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prospect Airport Services ORD DL/T5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue averages 2.3 TCR (52% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 36 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Hawaii.

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue (133 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue
DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue (133 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · HI · Lihue

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 87 employers in Lihue, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prospect Airport Services ORD DL/T5 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Aviation - OMA 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swissport Fueling Services - HOU - HOU-FUE 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : PSP - Palm Springs 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DON QUIJOTE - HONOLULU STORE 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawaii Dental Service (HDS) 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE 36N1 - EAN Holdings, LLC Hawaii Division 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilo Medical Investors Ltd dba Hale Anuenue Restorative Care Center 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royal Sonesta Kaua`i Resort 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royal Sonesta Kauai Resort 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2308 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0640 - KAUAI HI WHSE 249 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Hardwood Corp. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville), LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Klauer Manufacturing Co. - Washington Plant 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #6508 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : GUM - Guam 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lifetime Benefit Solutions - Butternut Dr 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain View Center 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.