Heat Treatment of Steel Parts · Ohio

Akron Steel Treating Company

Akron, OH · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Akron Steel Treating Company runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heat Treatment of Steel Parts workplace, earning a grade F.

Akron Steel Treating Company: 6.8 TCR = 207% of Heat Treatment of Steel Parts BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Akron Steel Treating Company safety composite

Akron Steel Treating Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2016→2023

Akron Steel Treating Company injury rate improved

Akron Steel Treating Company's TCR fell 10.9 from 10.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Akron, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/34
  • PHOTO FPM Heat Treating - …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FPM Heat Treating - Elk Grove Village (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Akron Steel Treating Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Akron Steel Treating Company averages 6.8 TCR (207% of the Heat Treatment of Steel Parts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Akron Steel Treating Company TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Akron Steel Treating Company falls in its industry

248 Heat Treatment of Steel Parts establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 34 Heat Treatment of Steel Parts employers in Ohio.

Akron Steel Treating Company (37 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Akron Steel Treating Company
Akron Steel Treating Company (37 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Akron Steel Treating Company has fewer employees than the Heat Treatment of Steel Parts median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.7 8.0 4 0 0
2021 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2020 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2016 10.9 8.7 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · OH · Akron

248 Heat Treatment of Steel Parts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 512 employers in Akron, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FPM Heat Treating - Elk Grove Village 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Heat Treat, LLC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Steel Treating, Inc. 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SW Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lead Building Company LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unified Restoration Systems, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron 6,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akron Children's Hospital 6,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summa Health - Akron City 4,801 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akron General Medical Center 4,176 FTE
NAT-TCR Village Fresh Market 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grass Farm Garden Accents, William Y Gil Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Njavl - Mail Innovations Rpf 23 - Avenel Nj 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HCA Houston Healthcare Medical Center 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE eTEC Fire Protection 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE B.E.Giovannetti & Sons / Half Moon Fruit & Produce 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tallahassee Roofing Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Hunt Construction, Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.