Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Alden Gardens of Waterford

Aurora, IL · ~75 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alden Gardens of Waterford runs at 294% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Alden Gardens of Waterford: 11.2 TCR = 294% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alden Gardens of Waterford safety composite

Alden Gardens of Waterford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Alden Gardens of Waterford injury rate improved

Alden Gardens of Waterford's TCR fell 3.6 from 9.1 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2018=2.0 · 2021=20.3 · 2022=26.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Aurora, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 294% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #183/265
  • PHOTO Willow Park ALF
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willow Park ALF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Alden Gardens of Waterford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alden Gardens of Waterford averages 11.2 TCR (294% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alden Gardens of Waterford TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2018=2 · 2021=20.3 · 2022=26.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Alden Gardens of Waterford falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Alden Gardens of Waterford (75 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alden Gardens of Waterford
Alden Gardens of Waterford (75 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Alden Gardens of Waterford has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2023 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2022 26.2 26.2 1 11 0
2021 20.3 20.3 0 9 0
2018 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 9.1 7.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Aurora

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 325 employers in Aurora, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willow Park ALF 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wallowa Valley Senior Living 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Aurora Management, LLC 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Senior Living 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kankakee Nursery Co. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenhouse 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois American Water (Chicago Metro) 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haier Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 204 3,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Factor Aurora 2,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Copley Medical Center, Inc. 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANDY FRAIN SERVICES INC 2,100 FTE
NAT-TCR Binder Park Zoological Society, Inc 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Retreats Seashore 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercedes-Benz U.S. Plant** 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Palihouse Santa Barbara 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE KHS&S Contractors - Concord 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Palms at Sun City 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enlightened Equipment 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE ORC Industries, Inc.-La Crosse 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.