Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Oregon

Wallowa Valley Senior Living

Enterprise, OR · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wallowa Valley Senior Living runs at 294% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Wallowa Valley Senior Living: 11.2 TCR = 294% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wallowa Valley Senior Living safety composite

Wallowa Valley Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.0

2016→2020

Wallowa Valley Senior Living injury rate improved

Wallowa Valley Senior Living's TCR fell 14.0 from 16.8 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.8 · 2017=16.9 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Enterprise, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 294% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #75/92
  • PHOTO Willow Park ALF
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willow Park ALF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Wallowa Valley Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wallowa Valley Senior Living averages 11.2 TCR (294% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wallowa Valley Senior Living TCR series: 2016=16.8 · 2017=16.9 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Wallowa Valley Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 92 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Wallowa Valley Senior Living (29 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wallowa Valley Senior Living
Wallowa Valley Senior Living (29 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Wallowa Valley Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 8.2 4.1 2 0 0
2017 16.9 8.4 4 0 0
2016 16.8 16.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OR · Enterprise

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 5 employers in Enterprise, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willow Park ALF 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alden Gardens of Waterford 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Aurora Management, LLC 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Senior Living 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GardenScape Nursery INC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coleman Ag 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Administration Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Port Westward 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wallowa County Health Care District 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-00371 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-00371 FAC-00371-ENTERPRISE-OR 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY 0019 0371 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly (#338) 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Beal Air 534- Murieta Market 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Acoustic Specialties, Inc. 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caylym Home AVE 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Firebird Artisan Mills 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas R Moran Construction Company 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truemper's Concrete Services, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calhoun GA 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.