Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Minnesota

Alexandria Light and Power

Alexandria, MN · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alexandria Light and Power runs at 601% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Alexandria Light and Power: 16.8 TCR = 601% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alexandria Light and Power safety composite

Alexandria Light and Power scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2018→2019

Alexandria Light and Power injury rate improved

Alexandria Light and Power's TCR fell 3.7 from 18.7 in 2018 to 15.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=18.7 · 2019=15.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Alexandria, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.8 · 601% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #36/38
  • PHOTO Campus Communication…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Campus Communications Group (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Alexandria Light and Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alexandria Light and Power averages 16.8 TCR (601% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alexandria Light and Power TCR series: 2018=18.7 · 2019=15 · BLS 2.8

Where Alexandria Light and Power falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 38 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Minnesota.

Alexandria Light and Power (36 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Alexandria Light and Power
Alexandria Light and Power (36 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Alexandria Light and Power has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 15.0 3.0 5 0 0
2018 18.7 5.3 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MN · Alexandria

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Alexandria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Campus Communications Group 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Telecable Inc 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Cable Construction, Inc. 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMEL2 - Elko, MN 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas County Hospital DBA Alomere Health 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas Machine Inc. 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Extrusion Company 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Austin SDO 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Foote ICF 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Care of San Angelo 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunset Manor 16.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. Inc. - Plant 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Home Health OH 1 46-3935359 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital Couriers Houston 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 42932 - Cranberry Fac 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.