Aluminum door and window, residential-type, installation · California

J&J Quality Door, Inc

Stockton, CA · ~149 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J&J Quality Door, Inc runs at 404% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aluminum door and window, residential-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

J&J Quality Door, Inc: 11.3 TCR = 404% of Aluminum door and window, residential-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J&J Quality Door, Inc safety composite

J&J Quality Door, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

J&J Quality Door, Inc: 6.4 → 10.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 17.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

J&J Quality Door, Inc's TCR rose 4.5 from 6.4 in 2017 to 10.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238350 · Stockton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 404% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #53/66
  • PHOTO Corp. Office
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 110 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corp. Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

J&J Quality Door, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J&J Quality Door, Inc averages 11.3 TCR (404% of the Aluminum door and window, residential-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J&J Quality Door, Inc TCR series: 2017=6.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=17.4 · 2022=11.8 · 2024=10.9 · BLS 2.8

Where J&J Quality Door, Inc falls in its industry

367 Aluminum door and window, resi establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 66 Aluminum door and window, resi employers in California.

J&J Quality Door, Inc (149 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J&J Quality Door, Inc
J&J Quality Door, Inc (149 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

J&J Quality Door, Inc has more employees than the Aluminum door and window, residential-ty median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.9 9.2 13 0 0
2022 11.8 5.3 20 0 0
2021 17.4 12.3 27 0 0
2020 13.1 10.6 16 0 0
2019 11.7 9.2 14 0 0
2018 7.8 6.5 10 2 0
2017 6.4 4.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238350 · CA · Stockton

367 Aluminum door and window, residential-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corp. Office 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avanti Install Texas 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skylight Specialists 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porcelen LTD CT LLC-Leeder Hill Dr 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Berry Farms Inc 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Artzai, LLC 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pattern Energy Group Inc 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE EASTERN CONSTRUCT/FLD SRVC-1 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Alger Correctional Facility 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Elbow Lake Store 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Guy Bennett Lumber Co. 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Three Springs Farms 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simon's Trucking Inc. 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE McHenry County Conservation District 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 71) 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.