Nuclear power plant construction · Illinois

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station

Clinton, IL · ~68 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear power plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station: 0.9 TCR = 31% of Nuclear power plant construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station safety composite

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station held a steady TCR band

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Clinton, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/50
  • PHOTO KAMO Power Coopertive
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KAMO Power Coopertive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station averages 0.9 TCR (31% of the Nuclear power plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station falls in its industry

1,605 Nuclear power plant constructi establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 50 Nuclear power plant constructi employers in Illinois.

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station (68 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station
Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station (68 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Allied Power Services - Exelon, Clinton Station has fewer employees than the Nuclear power plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · IL · Clinton

1,605 Nuclear power plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 27 employers in Clinton, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KAMO Power Coopertive 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division #24 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kent Power Ohio 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Fresno-North Chestnut 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries -MAG 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva STJ1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2057-Centralia, IL 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Rockford Service Center 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clinton Power Station 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Custom-Pak Group A/Group B/PDC/Corp 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warner Hospital & Health Services 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Liberty Village of Clinton 138 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Technologies Group (ITG) : Field Controls 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #226 LOUISVILLE, KY 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brady SoCal Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Construction Company Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homeland 169 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE LEO Leonardo 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal-NON DOT 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Baler Company 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.