Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Delaware

ALOFT AeroArchitects

Georgetown, DE · ~249 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ALOFT AeroArchitects runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

ALOFT AeroArchitects: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ALOFT AeroArchitects safety composite

ALOFT AeroArchitects scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ALOFT AeroArchitects: 0.8 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2022

ALOFT AeroArchitects's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.8 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Georgetown, DE AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO BAE Systems I&S - Mo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BAE Systems I&S - Mojave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Delaware employers → · Look up another →

ALOFT AeroArchitects in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ALOFT AeroArchitects averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ALOFT AeroArchitects TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2022=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where ALOFT AeroArchitects falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Delaware alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Delaware.

ALOFT AeroArchitects (249 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ALOFT AeroArchitects
ALOFT AeroArchitects (249 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

ALOFT AeroArchitects has more employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.8 1.1 5 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · DE · Georgetown

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,487 rated employers in Delaware with headcount on file · 36 employers in Georgetown, DE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems I&S - Mojave 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HVAMA02 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embraer Aircraft Customer Service Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mingo Aerospace, LLC 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZSAL 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE 500288200 - UNIV. OF DELAWARE-PENCADER 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE HARRINGTON (DEMIL) 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paper Mill West 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Georgetown Plant 1,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027613-MOUNTAIRE-DE 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Shore Poultry 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2791 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Fergus Falls Schools Cleveland 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ole Mexican Foods, Houston 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crowne Plaza Atlanta Midtown 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Flowers Baking Company of Tyler, LLC. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trevose, PA 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparta Community Hospital 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Furniture Mart USA Corporate Office and Distribution Center 99 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHRG MD Sales & Marketing 249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.