Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave

Mojave, CA · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave safety composite

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave held a steady TCR band

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.3 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Mojave, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #37/104
  • PHOTO HVAMA02
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HVAMA02 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems I&S - Mojave averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave TCR series: 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems I&S - Mojave falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 104 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in California.

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave (43 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems I&S - Mojave
BAE Systems I&S - Mojave (43 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

BAE Systems I&S - Mojave has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Mojave

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 29 employers in Mojave, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HVAMA02 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALOFT AeroArchitects 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embraer Aircraft Customer Service Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mingo Aerospace, LLC 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARVIN ADMINISTRATION 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald W Beeman 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Vineyard Management, LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virgin Galactic LLC 1,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 512 1,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TSC,LLC 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Sanborn Solar Storage TerraGen1A 1B 20145007 439 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacobs - NORTH HUDSON SEWERAGE AUTHORITY - OMI 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR meador boys express 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60107 Fort Worth 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fibrebond 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oregon City 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30405 Capstone Dg Fulton Mo 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oswego Health & Rehab 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plastics Division 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.