Telemarketing services on a contract or fee basis · Ohio

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles

Niles, OH · ~610 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Telemarketing services on a contract or fee basis workplace, earning a grade A.

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles: 1.1 TCR = 41% of Telemarketing services on a contract or fee basis BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles safety composite

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2019

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles injury rate improved

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561422 · Niles, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Tuscon, AZ East
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~610 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tuscon, AZ East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles averages 1.1 TCR (41% of the Telemarketing services on a contract or fee basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=0 · 2019=0.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles falls in its industry

159 Telemarketing services on a co establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Telemarketing services on a co employers in Ohio.

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles (610 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 379 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 00.511.52 Average employees Total Case Rate Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles
Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles (610 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 379 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Alorica Business Solutions LLC- Niles has more employees than the Telemarketing services on a contract or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.9 0.9 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.3 0.6 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561422 · OH · Niles

159 Telemarketing services on a contract or fee basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 54 employers in Niles, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tuscon, AZ East 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mackenzie-Childs-Burkhart 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGR Group Nevada, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KS-Wichita Call Center 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Next Generation Films, Inc. 611 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milacron Afton 611 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kane Warehousing West Jefferson OH MARS 609 FTE
STATE-SIZE S.A. Comunale - Norton 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR Niles, OH 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet Aerospace - Niles Operations 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet Aerospace - Niles Operastions 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRT Extrusions Inc 324 FTE
NAT-TCR CECO Concrete : Knoxville Equipment Ctr. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-Abs 0016 1002 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1430 Sycamore Rd 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Richardson-Wayland Electrical Company LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dph1 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimball Electronics Jasper 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : DTW - Detroit 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE WVUH Operations Support Center 610 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.