Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Missouri

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc.

Ozark, MO · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. safety composite

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.16× in 2024

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Ozark, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO Honeywell
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Honeywell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Missouri.

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpine Aviation Group, Inc.
Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · MO · Ozark

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 35 employers in Ozark, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Honeywell 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyonek Manufacturing Group Inc Warner Robins 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTAS Rockford Plant 1 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Lexington Park Site (1379) 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - F&M Metering Services 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Co-Mo Electric Cooperative - Lake Business Center 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodard & Curran - PWSD #2 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 379 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 379 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fiocchi of America, Inc. Ozark 157 FTE
NAT-TCR Harris Welding and Machine 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilgrim's Douglas Hatchery 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR R&S Excavation, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Trail Energy 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knight Refrigerated Atlanta 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glacier Oil and Gas Corp 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kwik Trip Yard Operations 868 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garrity Asphalt Reclaiming, Inc. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.