Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Illinois

UTAS Rockford Plant 1

Rockford, IL · ~180 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

UTAS Rockford Plant 1: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 safety composite

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2018

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 injury rate improved

UTAS Rockford Plant 1's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Rockford, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Honeywell
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Honeywell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UTAS Rockford Plant 1 averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where UTAS Rockford Plant 1 falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Illinois.

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 (180 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate UTAS Rockford Plant 1
UTAS Rockford Plant 1 (180 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

UTAS Rockford Plant 1 has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · IL · Rockford

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 405 employers in Rockford, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Honeywell 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpine Aviation Group, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyonek Manufacturing Group Inc Warner Robins 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Lexington Park Site (1379) 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE F.E. Moran, Inc Fire Protection of Northern Illinois 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE E&K of Chicago, Inc. 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Levy Company 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur West Oil Refinery 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR ILRKF - ROCKFORD AIR HUB 2,634 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swedish American Hospital - 4800 2,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCI Pharma Services Rockford 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR SwedishAmerican Hospital 1,855 FTE
NAT-TCR UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nexeo Solutions- Morrisville 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC - Airport United Airlines Offices 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), Inc. - DBA ABJ Fire Protection Syracuse location 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Little Rapids Corporation - Shawano Mill 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Porte PP 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocala Center (Floca) 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nampa Center (Idnam) 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.