Water control and quality program administration · California

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division

Bakersfield, CA · ~208 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division: 7.1 TCR = 223% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division safety composite

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 30% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2024

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division injury rate improved

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division's TCR fell 1.7 from 7.4 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.4 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Bakersfield, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 223% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #47/56
  • PHOTO Sanitary District of…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanitary District of Decatur (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows O&M - San Joaquin Field Division averages 7.1 TCR (223% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division TCR series: 2017=7.4 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=7 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.2

Where O&M - San Joaquin Field Division falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 56 Water control and quality prog employers in California.

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division (208 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate O&M - San Joaquin Field Division
O&M - San Joaquin Field Division (208 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

O&M - San Joaquin Field Division has more employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 3.4 8 2 0
2023 9.3 7.0 13 3 1
2022 5.4 2.4 9 0 0
2021 11.6 7.9 8 11 0
2020 7.0 6.4 12 0 0
2019 4.6 3.4 8 0 0
2018 6.1 4.5 11 0 0
2017 7.4 1.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · Bakersfield

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanitary District of Decatur 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Solid Waste Management 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR O&M - San Luis Field Division 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR O&M - Southern Field Division 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Red Blossom 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE NB Farms, Inc 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renova Energy corp. 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlsbad Office 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR Interlachen Country Club 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 432 Perry Street 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Sinai Brooklyn Hospital 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Akea Farms, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waitex International Co Ltd 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAA Arizona 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altronix 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville 074 208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.