Mesh made from purchased wire · Texas

AMACS Process Tower Internals

Houston, TX · ~112 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMACS Process Tower Internals runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mesh made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade B.

AMACS Process Tower Internals: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Mesh made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMACS Process Tower Internals safety composite

AMACS Process Tower Internals scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

AMACS Process Tower Internals injury rate improved

AMACS Process Tower Internals's TCR fell 2.7 from 4.8 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #15/29
  • PHOTO Material Handling Di…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Material Handling Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

AMACS Process Tower Internals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMACS Process Tower Internals averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Mesh made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMACS Process Tower Internals TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where AMACS Process Tower Internals falls in its industry

270 Mesh made from purchased wire establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 29 Mesh made from purchased wire employers in Texas.

AMACS Process Tower Internals (112 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AMACS Process Tower Internals
AMACS Process Tower Internals (112 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

AMACS Process Tower Internals has more employees than the Mesh made from purchased wire median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 3 0 0
2017 6.1 2.6 6 1 0
2016 4.8 3.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · TX · Houston

270 Mesh made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Material Handling Division 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McEwen 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadow Burke - Fort Worth MFG 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bison Drilling & Field Services, LLC 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance TX 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Power Funds 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cattlemen 1 Solar 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR The Manor at Greendale 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadillac SC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Winston Salem Facility 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas City 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Astro Machine Works, Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spectrum Solutions, Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Everett's Landscape Management, Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 98 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.