Fabrics, woven wire, made from purchased wire · Tennessee

Material Handling Division

Nashville, TN · ~98 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Material Handling Division runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fabrics, woven wire, made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade B.

Material Handling Division: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Fabrics, woven wire, made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Material Handling Division safety composite

Material Handling Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Material Handling Division injury rate improved

Material Handling Division's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Nashville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO AMACS Process Tower …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMACS Process Tower Internals (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Material Handling Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Material Handling Division averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Fabrics, woven wire, made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Material Handling Division TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Material Handling Division falls in its industry

270 Fabrics, woven wire, made from establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Fabrics, woven wire, made from employers in Tennessee.

Material Handling Division (98 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Material Handling Division
Material Handling Division (98 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Material Handling Division has more employees than the Fabrics, woven wire, made from purchased median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.0 4.3 7 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2020 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2019 2.8 0.9 3 0 0
2018 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · TN · Nashville

270 Fabrics, woven wire, made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMACS Process Tower Internals 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McEwen 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadow Burke - Fort Worth MFG 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction Co. - Nashville Region 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.C. Mathews Contractor, LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA TN Memphis 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Long Foundation Drilling Co. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR Sig Sauer (Exeter) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrigan Brothers, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Molded Fiber Glass 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Lumber Company, Inc. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Americold Logistics, LLC: Savannah 2 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Maintenance and Welding 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCL Label 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.