Luncheon meat, poultry, manufacturing · Georgia

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride

Douglas, GA · ~103 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Luncheon meat, poultry, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Luncheon meat, poultry, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride safety composite

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2020→2022

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride injury rate improved

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride's TCR fell 2.1 from 6.8 in 2020 to 4.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.8 · 2022=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Douglas, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #61/67
  • PHOTO Cooper Farms Cooked …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cooper Farms Cooked Meats (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Luncheon meat, poultry, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride TCR series: 2020=6.8 · 2022=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride falls in its industry

509 Luncheon meat, poultry, manufa establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 67 Luncheon meat, poultry, manufa employers in Georgia.

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride (103 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride
Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride (103 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride has fewer employees than the Luncheon meat, poultry, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.6 4.6 4 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · GA · Douglas

509 Luncheon meat, poultry, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 67 employers in Douglas, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cooper Farms Cooked Meats 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Premium Poultry 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OKF Fort Smith Reed Lane Plant 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OKF Transportation 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbus Operating 3610 Gentian Boulevard Columbus GA 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Ga EMC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Construction Company of Fort Gaines 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLINE_Roswell, GA 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRH Healthcare INC 1,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6010 988 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6010 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing plant 906 FTE
NAT-TCR Killdeer Mountain Manufacturing, Inc. Hettinger facility 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North Woods Place 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Proprietors of the Cemetery of Mount Auburn 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0741 - San Luis Obispo Ca Whse 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE el super 61 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE el super 62 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE el super #12 Arleta 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Langston Facilities 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.