Retirement communities, continuing care · Arizona
Amber Lights
Tucson, AZ · ~81 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 12.6
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Amber Lights runs at 331% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.
Amber Lights: 12.6 TCR = 331% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Amber Lights safety composite
Amber Lights scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
35/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 12.59 per 100 workers
Safer than 19% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 4.24 per 100 workers
Safer than 42% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−3.7
2017→2024
Amber Lights injury rate improved
Amber Lights's TCR fell 3.7 from 8.0 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 35.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=8.0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=27.5 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=35.5 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=4.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 623311 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 331% of ind
- DART 4.2 DART
- RANK #90/109
- PHOTO The Springs at Bozeman
- BOOK 8y book
- INJ 25 inj
- SIZE ~81 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: The Springs at Bozeman (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →
Amber Lights in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Amber Lights
12.6 TCR
- The Springs at
The Springs at Bozeman
12.6 TCR
- Ecumen Lakesho
Ecumen Lakeshore
12.6 TCR
- Mainstreet Vil
Mainstreet Village
12.6 TCR
- Portland Place
Portland Place
12.6 TCR
What this shows Amber Lights averages 12.6 TCR (331% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).
Amber Lights TCR series: 2017=8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=27.5 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=35.5 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.8
Where Amber Lights falls in its industry
4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishmentsSafer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.
Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 109 Retirement communities, contin employers in Arizona.
Amber Lights has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 35.5 | 35.5 | 6 | 19 | 0 |
| 2021 | 14.1 | 14.1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| 2020 | 27.5 | 21.4 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
623311 · AZ · Tucson
4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | The Springs at Bozeman | 12.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Ecumen Lakeshore | 12.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Mainstreet Village | 12.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Portland Place | 12.6 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Carrot Plant | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Ocotillo Powerplant | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | M. R. Tanner Construction | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | THREE PHASE ELECTRIC, LLC | 81 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | University of Arizona | 18,951 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site | 9,878 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Tucson Medical Center | 4,407 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson | 3,989 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Pasta Montana | 12.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Albany 081 | 12.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Decatur Day Program | 12.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | IKEA #569 Norfolk | 12.6 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Danco Anodizing | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Raley's 115- Reno | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | FXI Maywood | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Modern Building, Inc. | 81 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.