Ambulance services, air or ground · Connecticut

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC

Manchester, CT · ~171 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC runs at 224% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC: 8.5 TCR = 224% of Ambulance services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC safety composite

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2023

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC injury rate improved

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC's TCR fell 2.7 from 6.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=18.1 · 2020=0.1 · 2022=14.2 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Manchester, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 224% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #17/32
  • PHOTO Milam County Operat…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milam County Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC averages 8.5 TCR (224% of the Ambulance services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=18.1 · 2020=0.1 · 2022=14.2 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC falls in its industry

976 Ambulance services, air or gro establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 32 Ambulance services, air or gro employers in Connecticut.

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC (171 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC
Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC (171 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Ambulance Service of Manchester LLC has more employees than the Ambulance services, air or ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 3.7 6 0 0
2022 14.2 14.2 21 1 0
2020 0.1 0.1 16 1 0
2017 18.1 16.6 24 0 0
2016 6.4 5.1 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · CT · Manchester

976 Ambulance services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 145 employers in Manchester, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milam County Operations 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Romed, Inc 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin Station 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR So AZ OverheadOperations 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE OKAY Berlin 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turbine Controls Inc. 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE BUDNEY OVERHAUL & REPAIR, LTD HEADQUARTERS 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE DATTCO - New Britain School Bus 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Memorial Hospital 1,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 235 MANCHESTER CT 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1891 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Sensei Wellness Holdings Inc 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Samson Plant 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SF - 1735 Mission St, SF LM/WCC 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Weiser Care of Cascadia 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100513 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 102586 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Silicone Technologies 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lion Copolymer Geismar, LLC 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.