Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction · Minnesota

American Engineering Testing, Inc.

Saint Paul, MN · ~458 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Engineering Testing, Inc. runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction workplace, earning a grade B.

American Engineering Testing, Inc.: 1.8 TCR = 66% of Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Engineering Testing, Inc. safety composite

American Engineering Testing, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

American Engineering Testing, Inc. held a steady TCR band

American Engineering Testing, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.8 in 2019 to 1.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.8 · 2020=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Saint Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #7/30
  • PHOTO Patriot General Engi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~458 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Patriot General Engineering. Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

American Engineering Testing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Engineering Testing, Inc. averages 1.8 TCR (66% of the Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Engineering Testing, Inc. TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where American Engineering Testing, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Cleaning building interiors du establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 30 Cleaning building interiors du employers in Minnesota.

American Engineering Testing, Inc. (458 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate American Engineering Testing, Inc.
American Engineering Testing, Inc. (458 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

American Engineering Testing, Inc. has more employees than the Cleaning building interiors during and i median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.9 1.2 8 0 0
2019 1.8 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MN · Saint Paul

1,634 Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Patriot General Engineering. Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isaac Blair & Company, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fields Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HydroChem LLC-CRI 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turkey Valley Farms 458 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jostens - Broadway 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travel Tags Inc - 0164-MNIN1 456 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal Cabinet Works, Inc. 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR CB 233 - Jackson 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 28 Demaree 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0018 Albemarle 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Moloney,Inc.--Transformers Plant 458 FTE
NAT-SIZE AstraZeneca West Chester, OH 458 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-9970-CORPORATE 458 FTE
NAT-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge 458 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.