Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio

American Steel Treating

Perrysburg, OH · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Steel Treating runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

American Steel Treating: 11.2 TCR = 340% of Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Steel Treating safety composite

American Steel Treating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.0

2021→2024

American Steel Treating injury rate improved

American Steel Treating's TCR fell 12.0 from 22.1 in 2021 to 10.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 22.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=22.1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=10.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Perrysburg, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 340% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #33/34
  • PHOTO Nitrex, Inc. Chicago…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nitrex, Inc. Chicago Operations (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

American Steel Treating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Steel Treating averages 11.2 TCR (340% of the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Steel Treating TCR series: 2021=22.1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where American Steel Treating falls in its industry

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 34 Hardening (i.e., heat treating employers in Ohio.

American Steel Treating (34 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate American Steel Treating
American Steel Treating (34 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

American Steel Treating has fewer employees than the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.2 6.8 3 0 0
2023 9.7 3.2 3 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 22.1 9.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · OH · Perrysburg

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 144 employers in Perrysburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nitrex, Inc. Chicago Operations 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MED TEK INC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.W. Harris Co., Inc. - Gordonsville 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bauman Orchards Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millcreek Gardens LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow View Growers, Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ayers farms inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR First Solar Perrysburg - PGT1 & Office, PGT2 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-TOLE 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR First Solar Perrysburg 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR 436 995 FTE
NAT-TCR HWE Woburn Insulation 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hungry Howie's Distributing, Inc. Florida 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI4 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Franz Bakery 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sesh Technologies Manufacturing 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARCA InterCare Service Copper A & B 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARCA InterCare Service South Valley A & B 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pegasus Industries & Packaging -Cane Run Road 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.