Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie

Eden Prairie, MN · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie runs at 326% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie: 10.8 TCR = 326% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie safety composite

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.3

2016→2019

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie injury rate improved

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie's TCR fell 13.3 from 16.4 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.4 · 2017=20.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Eden Prairie, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 326% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO MED TEK INC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MED TEK INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie averages 10.8 TCR (326% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie TCR series: 2016=16.4 · 2017=20.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Minnesota.

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie (31 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie
Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie (31 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Eden Prairie has fewer employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 20.3 6.8 3 3 0
2016 16.4 6.6 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MN · Eden Prairie

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MED TEK INC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.W. Harris Co., Inc. - Gordonsville 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nitrex, Inc. Chicago Operations 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Steel Treating 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Island Dairy 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Protein Sources, LLP 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Gen Plant-UC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Plant 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Save A Lot #414 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-6082-Pottery Barn Kids 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dura-Stress, Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Street 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Faf Den 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogall Painting, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faf Sea 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moore Transport - Jessup 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.