Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Minnesota

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc

Mankato, MN · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc: 7.9 TCR = 241% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc safety composite

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2018→2022

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc injury rate improved

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc's TCR fell 11.4 from 13.7 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.7 · 2022=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 241% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #17/27
  • PHOTO Fisher Barton Specia…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fisher Barton Specialty Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ameristar Manufacturing Inc averages 7.9 TCR (241% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc TCR series: 2018=13.7 · 2022=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Ameristar Manufacturing Inc falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 27 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Minnesota.

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc (54 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ameristar Manufacturing Inc
Ameristar Manufacturing Inc (54 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Ameristar Manufacturing Inc has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 13.7 4.5 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MN · Mankato

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fisher Barton Specialty Products 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HTT Sheboygan Plant 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WENZEL METAL SPINNING, INC. 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elder-Jones Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haldeman Homme, Inc. - Minneapolis - Corporate 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Iron Mountain Industries, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZUKI 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1124 - Wheaton Md Whse 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1159 - Sioux Falls Sd Whse 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village of Lake Zurich - Fire 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9095-PDX 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenn-Feld Group-Van Wert 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill of Colorado - Central Park 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.