Nonferrous alloys (except aluminum, copper) made in integrated secondary smelting and alloying plants · New Jersey

Ames Advanced Material Corp.

South Plainfield, NJ · ~155 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ames Advanced Material Corp. runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nonferrous alloys (except aluminum, copper) made in integrated secondary smelting and alloying plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Ames Advanced Material Corp.: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Nonferrous alloys (except aluminum, copper) made in integrated secondary smelting and alloying plants BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ames Advanced Material Corp. safety composite

Ames Advanced Material Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ames Advanced Material Corp. held a steady TCR band

Ames Advanced Material Corp.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · South Plainfield, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK P39
  • PHOTO Novamet Specialty Pr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Novamet Specialty Products Corporat (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Ames Advanced Material Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ames Advanced Material Corp. averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Nonferrous alloys (except aluminum, copper) made in integrated secondary smelting and alloying plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ames Advanced Material Corp. TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=6 · 2019=3.2 · 2023=6 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Ames Advanced Material Corp. falls in its industry

132 Nonferrous alloys (except alum establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Ames Advanced Material Corp. (155 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ames Advanced Material Corp.
Ames Advanced Material Corp. (155 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Ames Advanced Material Corp. has more employees than the Nonferrous alloys (except aluminum, copp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 4.3 6 0 0
2023 6.0 3.7 8 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 4 1 0
2018 6.0 6.0 10 0 0
2017 3.3 0.7 3 2 0
2016 4.2 3.5 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · NJ · South Plainfield

132 Nonferrous alloys (except aluminum, copper) made in integrated secondary smelting and alloying plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 112 employers in South Plainfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Novamet Specialty Products Corporat 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR H. Kramer & Co. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwood Facility 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Materion - Albuquerque (Refinery) 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Component Assembly Systems New Jersey 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE D36 Philadelphia 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dr. Schar - Swedesboro 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Power Systems : Metem - Parsippany, NJ, USA 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSE&G NJ Projects & Construction 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSE&G NJ - DELIVERY PROJECT & CONSTRUCTION (DP&C) 868 FTE
CITY-NEAR Accurate Diagnostic Lab 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR G&W Laboratories, Inc. 363 FTE
NAT-TCR 1100 LKQ Crystal River 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Sullivan 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Xtek Inc 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wareham Massachusetts 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3064 Keystone Automotive Atlanta 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quincy 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shreveport, LA 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.