Grocery stores · Pennsylvania

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring

Sinking Spring, PA · ~155 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grocery stores workplace, earning a grade C.

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring: 3.1 TCR = 91% of Grocery stores BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring safety composite

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring held a steady TCR band

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Sinking Spring, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #278/1287
  • PHOTO GATES
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GATES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring averages 3.1 TCR (91% of the Grocery stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.4

Where Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery stores establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #278 safest of 1287 Grocery stores employers in Pennsylvania.

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring (155 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring
Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring (155 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring has more employees than the Grocery stores median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2021 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2019 4.2 3.2 4 0 0
2018 3.2 2.1 3 0 0
2017 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2016 2.2 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · PA · Sinking Spring

30,654 Grocery stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 21 employers in Sinking Spring, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GATES 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowes Foods #245 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 1243 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 0035 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haverfield International, Inc 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Construction 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. C. Dellovade INC 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piramal Pharma Solutions 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Precision Device - West 968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Sinking Spring 944 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1717 LOWE S OF S. READING PA 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1717 171 FTE
NAT-TCR Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Renaissance DelMonte Lodge 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stevens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Hallettsville 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3064 Keystone Automotive Atlanta 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quincy 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ames Advanced Material Corp. 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shreveport, LA 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.