Poultry Processing · Mississippi

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing

Laurel, MS · ~602 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Poultry Processing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing: 4.0 TCR = 122% of Poultry Processing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing safety composite

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing: 2.7 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing's TCR rose 1.5 from 2.7 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Laurel, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 122% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #26/41
  • PHOTO Pure Prairie Poultry
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 125 inj
  • SIZE ~602 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pure Prairie Poultry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing averages 4.0 TCR (122% of the Poultry Processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing falls in its industry

509 Poultry Processing establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 41 Poultry Processing employers in Mississippi.

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing (602 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing
Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing (602 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing has fewer employees than the Poultry Processing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 3.6 17 6 0
2023 4.8 4.6 19 7 0
2022 4.8 3.9 19 8 0
2021 4.8 4.2 13 13 0
2020 3.6 3.1 13 7 0
2019 5.2 4.4 13 13 0
2018 3.2 2.6 13 4 0
2017 2.9 2.4 8 10 0
2016 2.7 1.6 10 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Laurel

509 Poultry Processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 78 employers in Laurel, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pure Prairie Poultry 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Koch Foods Prepared Plant 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary Poultry - Dayton VA Plant 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dorada Foods Reidsville 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing 603 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casino and Hotel 600 FTE
STATE-SIZE S3 Stennis Space Center (SSC) Operations 595 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neel-Schaffer, Inc. 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Laurel 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard Industries Inc (Transformer) 2,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Quality Food Service, Inc 1,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant 841 FTE
NAT-TCR Kindred Main 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR D'Annunzio Group Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Reddy Ice - Plant City (413) 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Six South Street Hotel 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rummel Construction Main Office 602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon Community Hospital 602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Briggs & Stratton 602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Clairsville Jobsites 602 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.