Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Michigan

Amphenol Borisch Technologies

Grand Rapids, MI · ~231 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol Borisch Technologies runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Amphenol Borisch Technologies: 0.9 TCR = 29% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol Borisch Technologies safety composite

Amphenol Borisch Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2020→2023

Amphenol Borisch Technologies injury rate improved

Amphenol Borisch Technologies's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P70
  • PHOTO Hermetics - Melbourne
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~231 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hermetics - Melbourne (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol Borisch Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol Borisch Technologies averages 0.9 TCR (29% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol Borisch Technologies TCR series: 2020=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol Borisch Technologies falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Amphenol Borisch Technologies (231 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol Borisch Technologies
Amphenol Borisch Technologies (231 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Amphenol Borisch Technologies has more employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · MI · Grand Rapids

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hermetics - Melbourne 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 108 IND - LANDISVILLE 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cinch Connectivity Solutions Corporate 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maumelle (Little Rock Connector) 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1557_7119 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grede - Iron Mountain 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE FEMA Corporation of Michigan, INC. 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE ZF CVS Auburn Hills 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR S02899 - Charles City Landfill 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Public Safety (53) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherokee Nation Assurance-USAMRMC Fredrick 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TCS Industries, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE H+M Industrial EPC 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Light Blue Hill Hospital 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giorgio Foods Inc 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Houston 231 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.