Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction · Texas

H+M Industrial EPC

Pasadena, TX · ~231 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H+M Industrial EPC runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

H+M Industrial EPC: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H+M Industrial EPC safety composite

H+M Industrial EPC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2023

H+M Industrial EPC injury rate improved

H+M Industrial EPC's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/92
  • PHOTO Bay Ltd.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~231 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bay Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

H+M Industrial EPC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H+M Industrial EPC averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H+M Industrial EPC TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where H+M Industrial EPC falls in its industry

924 Chemical (except petrochemical establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 92 Chemical (except petrochemical employers in Texas.

H+M Industrial EPC (231 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate H+M Industrial EPC
H+M Industrial EPC (231 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

H+M Industrial EPC has more employees than the Chemical (except petrochemical process t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TX · Pasadena

924 Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bay Ltd. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irwin & Leighton 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Plus Services 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Arthur Liquefaction Project 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kitchen Pride Mushroom Farms 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Housley Communications, Inc. 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE TOTAL HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE, LLC - CORPORATE 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Dredging Company 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR Tracwell Systems, Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UniFirst Corp. Loc's 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Industries, LLC - Nashville - Branch 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-Line Plastics INC 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Light Blue Hill Hospital 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giorgio Foods Inc 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amphenol Borisch Technologies 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manitowoc Tool & Manufacturing, LLC 231 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.