Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Florida

Hermetics - Melbourne

Melbourne, FL · ~98 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hermetics - Melbourne runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Hermetics - Melbourne: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hermetics - Melbourne safety composite

Hermetics - Melbourne scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hermetics - Melbourne held a steady TCR band

Hermetics - Melbourne's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.0 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Cinch Connectivity S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cinch Connectivity Solutions Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Hermetics - Melbourne in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hermetics - Melbourne averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hermetics - Melbourne TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Hermetics - Melbourne falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Florida.

Hermetics - Melbourne (98 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Hermetics - Melbourne
Hermetics - Melbourne (98 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Hermetics - Melbourne has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · FL · Melbourne

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cinch Connectivity Solutions Corporate 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Co-Operative Industries Aerospace & Defense (CIA&D) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Borisch Technologies 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 435 AER - CULPEPER 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trulieve Juniper Creek 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wales Complex 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEST FLORIDA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE KB Home Jacksonville LLC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Colorado Springs - Nixon Station 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Linde - HYCO Clear Lake 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HoneywellRI13 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR IL Dept. of Revenue 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manor Care Health Services - Summer Trace SNF 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avenue Stores Logistics Operations 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE DHS of Blount County, LLC 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Park 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.