Chassis, automobile, manufacturing · Michigan

Android Industries - Headquarters

Auburn Hills, MI · ~154 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Android Industries - Headquarters runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chassis, automobile, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Android Industries - Headquarters: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Chassis, automobile, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Android Industries - Headquarters safety composite

Android Industries - Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Android Industries - Headquarters: 0.0 → 0.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 0.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Android Industries - Headquarters's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/26
  • PHOTO ThyssenKrupp Automot…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ThyssenKrupp Automotive Systems of America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Android Industries - Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Android Industries - Headquarters averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Chassis, automobile, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Android Industries - Headquarters TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Android Industries - Headquarters falls in its industry

158 Chassis, automobile, manufactu establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 26 Chassis, automobile, manufactu employers in Michigan.

Android Industries - Headquarters (154 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Android Industries - Headquarters
Android Industries - Headquarters (154 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Android Industries - Headquarters has fewer employees than the Chassis, automobile, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · MI · Auburn Hills

158 Chassis, automobile, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ThyssenKrupp Automotive Systems of America 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMW Financial Services NA, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yates Services, LLC @ Nissan ILC Warehouse 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Astemo Greenfield LLC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Energy Cooperative 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCG Companies 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoreline Fruit, LLC - Williamsburg 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Sagola 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Laird Controls North America Inc. - Warren 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornwell Quality Tools Company Corporate 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanofi Westborough 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE SUPA Doors 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panama City Health and Rehabilitation Center 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Labels - Mason 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.