Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing · Texas

Applied Materials

Name: Applied Materials Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Austin, TX · ~3,562 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Materials runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Applied Materials: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Materials safety composite

Applied Materials scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Applied Materials held a steady TCR band

Applied Materials's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.5 in 2019 to 0.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

DART 0.5 DART
RANK #7/11
PHOTO Lam Research Corp. T…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 63 inj
SIZE ~3,562 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.6
Lam Research C

0.6
ORHI02

0.6
MKS Beaverton

0.6
MTKA01

0.5

What this shows Applied Materials averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Applied Materials TCR series: 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Applied Materials falls in its industry

133 Semiconductor assembly and pac establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Semiconductor assembly and pac employers in Texas.

Applied Materials (3,562 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Applied Materials has more employees than the Semiconductor assembly and packaging mac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2021	0.8	0.5	40	0
2020	0.5	0.4	15	4
2019	0.5	0.3	8	4

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · TX · Austin

133 Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus	TUALATIN, OR	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ORHI02	HILLSBORO, OR	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MTKA01	KALISPELL, MT	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MKS Beaverton	BEAVERTON, OR	0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	ST LUKE'S MEDICAL CENTER	HOUSTON	3,551 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BNT	AUSTIN	3,550 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Select Water Solutions, LLC	GAINESVILLE	3,576 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435)	GRAND PRAIRIE	3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Ensign Services	Austin	11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas	Austin	8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin	Austin	6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST	Austin	5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR	HHI	Honolulu, HI	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Intel-Rio Rancho	Rio Rancho, NM	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	New Milford Public Schools Central Office	New Milford, CT	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	DuPont Kinston	Grifton, NC	0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Overlook Medical Center	Summit, NJ	3,560 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hillcrest Hospital	Mayfield Hts, OH	3,564 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Community Health Aide Services	Montebello, NY	3,557 FTE
NAT-SIZE	GA030 Atlanta - GP Center	Atlanta, GA	3,567 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.